Development History of Beas Project.
Beas Satluj Link Project.
Pong Dam Project.
| Developmental History of Beas Project |
|
The Beas Project, comprising two units namely, Unit-I – BSL Project and Unit-II – Beas Dam, is a part of the Master plan for the utilisation of the waters of the three eastern rivers viz. the Satluj, the Beas and the Ravi for irrigation and power-generation in an integrated manner. With the completion of Bhakra-Nangal Project, the waters of the Satluj (average flow 16,652 million cum or 13.5 million-acre feet) were fully harnessed. With the help of the existing Madhopur-Beas link which transfers, on an average, 2344 million cu m (0.9 million acre feet) of Ravi waters to the Beas, the Beas dam at Pong together with the Bhakra Dam enables India to harness about 92% of the average inflow of the three eastern rivers. With the completion of Beas-Satluj Link project, the figure has further risen to 97%. Beas Construction BoardThe agency of departmental construction, initiated at the Bhakra Dam, was adopted for the construction of the Beas Dam also. Punjab Government constituted the Beas Control Board in 1961 to exercise efficient technical and financial control over all matters pertaining to the construction of the project. Consequent upon the re-organisation of the Punjab in 1966, the execution of the Project was vested with the Government of India, on behalf of the Partner States, who reconstituted the Control Board and named it as ‘Beas Construction Board’ (BCB). The ‘Beas Construction Board’ under the Chairmanship of the Union Minister of Energy comprises, besides a full-time Secretary, headquartered at New Delhi, the Chief Ministers, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh; one Minister each from the States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan; Deputy Ministers, Energy and Irrigation Government of India; Secretary, Department of Power, Ministry of Energy, Government of India; Secretary, Irrigation, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Government of India; Chairman, Bhakra and Beas Management Board; Chairman, Central Water Commission; Member (Hydro-Electric), Central Electricity Authority; Joint Secretary, Ministry of Energy, Government of India; Financial Adviser and Joint Secretary, Department of Power, Ministry of Energy, Government of India; Secretaries, Irrigation and Power, Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan; Secretaries, Finance, Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan; Secretaries, Colonization and Revenue, Rajasthan; Financial Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Revenue Department, Himachal Pradesh; Chairmen, State Electricity Boards, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh; General Manager, Beas Project; Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officer, Beas Project; Chief Engineers, Irrigation Works, Punjab and Haryana; Chief Engineers, Electrical (Power Stations and Transmission), Beas Project; and the Chief Engineer, Rajasthan Canal Project. A Board of Consultants for Beas Project was constituted under the chairmanship of Dr.A.N.Khosla consisting of some most eminent and experienced engineers from within the country and outside. The present scheme was gradually evolved through a detailed and systematic study of the various alternatives after seeking advice from United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) |
| Beas Project Unit–II – Beas Dam Project |
|
The idea of a storage dam across Beas River at Pong was first mooted by Mr. C.E. Blaker of the Punjab PWD Irrigation Branch in 1926. A committee, led by Mr. A.J. Willey, Consulting Engineer, to the United States Bureau of Reclamation, Dr. P.S. Pinfold, the Chief Geologist to Attock Oil Co., and Mr. W.H. Nicholson, Superintending Engineer of Punjab PWD Irrigation Branch was appointed by Punjab Government in 1927 to report on the possibilities of storage of surplus waters of the Punjab rivers and their tributaries. The committee, on the basis of Mr. Blaker’s report, recommended that in view of high floods which were likely to occur at that site, an economical storage would be difficult to arrange. The committee was also of the opinion that in view of the soft, though uniform foundation a shingle and boulder embankment might prove to be the most practicable proposition. 1955 Project ReportInterest in storage on the Beas was revived in 1955. Geological, hydrological, material and other investigations were accordingly carried out, resulting in preliminary report on the Beas Dam Project. In this report, an earth dam having live storage capacity of 6764 million cubic metres and dead storage of 925 million cubic metres was proposed. The dam was visualized to be an earth-cum-rockfill structure with a concrete spillway section. No power generation was contemplated in this preliminary report. Nevertheless, the power potential of the project was recognised. 1959 Project ReportLater on, after carrying out further investigations a more detailed report for the Beas Dam at Pong was prepared and submitted to Punjab Government in 1959. In this report, an earth-cum-rockfill dam, 100.6 m high above river bed level, was proposed alongwith a hollow butteress type concrete dam, with an overflow spillway. No power generation was envisaged at that stage although provision was made for the installation of two power penstocks in the non overflow section of the concrete dam. Final Proposal of the ProjectSubsequent to the preparation of 1959 project report, considerable work on geological explorations, investigations for materials, preparations of preliminary designs, comparison of the economics of various types of layout of appurtenant works etc., was carried out. The Board of Consultants under the Chairmanship of Dr. A.N. Khosla, comprising some of the most eminent engineers from within the country and abroad contributed towards finalisation of project proposal. The advice of United States Bureau of Reclamation was also sought on various features of the project. Numerous hydraulic model tests were conducted at Central Water & Power Research Stations, Poona and Irrigation & Power Research Institute, Amritsar, as an aid to designs. The final scheme was gradually evolved through a detailed and systematic study of the various alternatives. The Proposal of features of the final scheme as adopted for constructions are as below: -
|